Sunday, February 20, 2011

The Argument in "Aria"

ARGUMENT: In the article “Aria” Richard Rodriquez makes a complex argument. On the one hand he expresses sadness about the slow death of his “private language” (Spanish), and the changes it brought to his family.  On the other hand, Rodriquez explains that even though this is a sad situation, it was necessary in order for him “to believe what had been technically true since my birth: I was an American citizen.”  Rodriquez expresses sorrow about the necessity of giving up much of what made his private language so wonderful, but he believes it was a good thing that his teachers forced him into speaking English.  Otherwise, he argues, he would not have been a confident part of the society in which he lived.  Rodriquez is critical of school programs that do not force children to assimilate, saying “bilingualists simplistically scorn the value and necessity of assimilation” (38).  Rodriquez argues that while children do give up something in order to master the dominant language, doing so gives them ownership of the dominant culture.    

2 comments:

  1. Yes! I completely agree! Yes it is sad he lost a strong bond with his family and ideally he shouldn’t have had to but by doing so he gained power in the world. I just realized how much everyone looks at people who can’t speak English and automatically just labels them as stupid. I can’t really say that the nuns did that but they did have concern for him. I myself am guilty of being frustrated with people who speak broken English when I’m at work. All of this just relates back to Delpit, being told the rules of the culture of power makes obtaining power easier.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a good post and you outline the argument very well. Despite the negative elements of losing the tightness of his family, I believe that Rodriguez's parents sacrificed there spanish private world for their children to make it in the United States.

    ReplyDelete